Exosomes were originally regarded as cellular metabolic waste. With the discovery of the antigen-presenting exosomes secreted by B lymphocytes involving anti-tumor responses in 1996and the exchange of genetic material between cells through RNA of the exosomes in 2007, people became aware of the importance of exosomes. These findings have also spurred scientists to explore and study exosomes. And exosome research has been becoming a research hotspot since 2007.
Figure 1: The history of exosome research
Subsequently, more and more evidence shows that exosome analysis and detection can assist in early diagnosis, efficacy evaluation and prognosis analysis of diseases. And scientists also have found exosomes can serve as vehicles to carry drugs, chemicals, or other molecules to the target tissue or organ for cancer treatment . Specific exosomes are promising to be made into anti-cancer vaccines in the future. Furthermore, isolated exosomes are suitable for a wide range of downstream analyses such as EM study, exosome label, exosome subpopulation, qRT-PCR profiling of exosomal miRNAs, and western blotting (WB).
Exosomes with high yield and purity are the basis of exosome research and the premise of guaranteeing the accuracy of research results. As exosomes widely exist in many body fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, amniotic fluid, ascites, blood, breast milk, and urine, so we must extract and purify exosomes from a wide range of cellular debris and other interfering components. Consequently, the isolation and purification of exosomes have become a major initiative in both basic research and clinical applications.
Five different exosomes isolation techniques have been developed capitalizing on the physicochemical and biochemical properties of exosomes. With the increasing demand for exosomes, various exosome isolation and purification kits with good properties are emerging. Here mainly introduce five traditional exosome isolation methods and four exosome isolation kits in the following sections.
Among the five exosome isolation methods, each method respectively exhibits a special exosomes' trait that aids their extraction such as density, shape, size, and immunoaffinity (surface proteins).
Ultracentrifugation is the most commonly used and reported exosome extraction method. It is the gold standard in exosome isolation. And it is popular in exosome research because of its easy operation, no middle waiting periods of samples. However, its disadvantages are high requirements for centrifugal equipment and long run time. Ultracentrifugation is usually divided into two forms: differential ultracentrifugation and density gradient ultracentrifugation.
Differential ultracentrifugation, also known as the pelleting method or simple ultracentrifugation method, gets exosome vesicles of similar size by using low-speed and high-speed centrifugation alternately. It is based on the difference in the density and size of the exosomes and other components in the sample. It is easy to operate. But repeated centrifugation and large centrifugal force may damage the structure of exosomes. The exosome yield is not high.
Density gradient ultracentrifugation is the variation of ultracentrifugation and contains two types: isopycnic ultracentrifugation and moving-zone ultracentrifugation. Isopycnic ultracentrifugation is a speed-zone separation method by which different particles respectively sedimentate at a certain speed, forming discrete solute zone bands in a centrifuge tube with a density gradient medium under the action of the ultracentrifugal force. The density gradient medium is pre-constructed in a centrifuge tube with progressively decreased density from bottom to top. Exosomes in the sample are enriched in the appropriate density range (1.10-1.21g/ml) and are finally harvested through brief ultracentrifugation of the density region of interest. The isolation technique is complicated, time-consuming, and has strict requirements on centrifugation time. And it is largely affected by the narrow load zone. And collected exosomes are contaminated with similar-size vesicles and lost (large centrifugal force). But exosomes extracted in this way are relatively high in production.
Moving-zone ultracentrifugation is based on size and mass instead of density to separate exosomes. Different from isopycnic ultracentrifugation, the gradient density medium used in the moving-zone ultracentrifugation has a lower density than that of any of the solutes.
Ultrafiltration method isolates exosomes by using the size characteristics of the exosomes (30 to 100 nm in diameter). It avoids the shortcomings of time consumption and special equipment requirement in ultracentrifugation. This method is relatively simple ＆ efficient and does not affect the biological activity of the exosomes. But the isolated exosomes are not of high purity due to interference with other vesicles of similar size. Besides, exosomes may block the filter pores, resulting in a shorter membrane life and lower separation efficiency. Adhesion occurs between exosomes trapped on the membrane, leading to a decrease in yield.
Polypolymer precipitation method separates exosomes by precipitating exosomes due to the interaction between polyethylene glycol (PEG) and exosomes. Because PEG can co-precipitate with hydrophobic proteins or lipid molecules. PEG was previously used to collect viruses from samples such as serum. The method is easy to operate and has a short cycle. But it also has some problems such as low purity ＆ recovery rate, high amount of heteroproteins (false positives), and uneven particle size.
In the magnetic bead immunoassay (also known as antibody affinity purification), exosomes first bind to magnetic beads covered with marker protein antibodies of exosomes. These antibodies specifically recognize exosomes' external biomarkers such as CD9 and CD63, etc. The complex exosomes-magnetic-antibody is absorbed and separated in the action of external magnetic. The magnetic bead method has the advantages of high specificity, simple operation, and fewer impurities. But its production is relatively low, and exosome biological activity is easily affected by pH and salt concentration. As a novel field, the best exosomal tags are still to be established. Additionally, underestimations and false negatives may arise from tumor heterogeneity in antigen expression and antigen modulations as the tumor progresses. Furthermore, the antigenic epitope may be blocked or masked.
Exosome Isolation Methods
Table 1: Comparision of five exosome isolation methods
Of course, all these isolation methods are often used not alone but two or more together. In practical applications, the combination of several methods can give full play to the advantages of each method while avoiding the disadvantages.
These conventional exosome separation methods are often limited by the resources of large instruments and equipment in the preparation of exosomes. And they have the defects of a complex operation, time consumption, low yield ＆ purity, and high cost. Therefore, traditional exosome separation methods are difficult to meet the demands of scientific research and clinical research on exosomes. This provides a commanding impetus and growing demands for simple, fast, efficient, and affordable techniques to separate exosomes.
Based on conventional isolation methods, some researchers and biotech companies develop and design exosome isolation and purification kits. These kits perfectly compensate for the disadvantages of traditional separation methods. Therefore, the kit method has gradually become the mainstream of exosome extraction methods, which can help most researchers to obtain high-quality exosomes.
Exosomes isolated by ultrafiltration contain the most RNA in quantification by fluorescent staining. An exosome isolation kit is developed to isolate exosomes and then extract RNA from the isolated exosomes from cell-free samples like urine, serum, cerebrospinal fluid. This mock ultrafiltration kit is a syringe filter tandemly configured with two membranes. When the sample passes through the syringe filter, exosomes in the sample remain on the lower membrane, while larger extracellular vesicles retain on the upper membrane.
The exosome isolation kit based on the precipitation method contains a hydrophilic polymer solution that precipitates exosomes and a sucrose density gradient reagent that enriches exosomes. These kits enable fast and efficient enrichment of intact exosomes from various biological samples such as cell culture media, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), ascitic fluid, amniotic fluid, milk, saliva, plasma ＆ serum, etc. A series of kit products of different article number correspond to different detection sample. It can exclude non-exosomes impurities such as high-abundance serum protein Albumin and IgG, significantly improve the purity of the exosomes and effectively reduce the false positive rate that is beneficial to downstream proteomics.
Tim4 protein can specifically recognize phosphatidylserine (PS) exposed on the outer of the exosome membrane. Some biological companies developed a novel exosome purification kit with Tim4-immobilized magnetic beads, which help capture exosomes from almost all samples (body fluids, cell culture media samples, etc.) in the presence of calcium ions. Isolated exosomes get purified by eluting with a chelating agent. However, exosomes collected by this kit may be mixed withTim4 and magnetic beads. There are also exosome isolation kits with magnetic beads kits covered with antibodies that target exosome biomarker proteins such as CD63, CD9, or CD81 in the markets. And these kits are able to isolate exosomes from cell culture media samples.
In the market, there is also exosome isolation and purification kit based on density gradient centrifugation. Exosomes, derived from the samples like cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), ascitic fluid, amniotic fluid, milk, and saliva, are suspended in the middle fluffy layer of the density gradient medium reagent at the action of the centrifugation forces. Finally, exosomes are enriched and purified with the molecular column. This kit avoids the contamination with artificial IgG and magnetic beads.
Exosome isolation kits achieve fast, convenient, and highly efficient extraction of exosomes with high purity and yield from the various sample solutions. Isolated exosomes using kits methods remain intact, maintaining the bioactivity of exosomes. Intact, pure, and high-producing exosomes provide a more stable and reliable guarantee for exosome research.
 G. Raposo, H.W. Nijman, W. Stoorvogel, R. Liejendekker, C.V. Harding, C.J. Melief, H.J. Geuze. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles [J]. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183:1161–1172.
H. Valadi, A. Bossios, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells [J]. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:654–659.
Zong SF, Wang L, et al. Facile detection of tumor-derived exosomes using magnetic nanobeads and SERS nanoprobes [J]. Anal Methods. 2016, 8:5001–08.
 Harding CV, Heuser JE, et al. Exosomes: looking back three decades and into the future [J]. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200:367–371.
 B.T. Pan, R.M. Johnstone. Fate of the transferrin receptor during maturation of sheep reticulocytes in vitro: selective externalization of the receptor [J]. Cell. 1983, 33:967–978.
 Pan BT, Teng K, et al. Electron microscopic evidence for externalization of the transferrin receptor in vesicular form in sheep reticulocytes [J]. J. Cell Biol.1985;101:942–948.
 Johnstone RM, Bianchini A, et al. Reticulocyte maturation and exosome release: transferrin receptor containing exosomes shows multiple plasma membrane functions [J]. Blood. 1989, 74:1844–1851.
 Safdar A, Saleem A, et al. The potential of endurance exercise-derived exosomes to treat metabolic diseases [J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016, 12:504–17.
Laulagnier K, Motta C, et al. Mast cell- and dendritic cell-derived exosomes display a specific lipid composition and an unusual membrane organization [J]. Biochem. J. 2004, 380:161–171.
 Keller S, Sanderson MP, Stoeck A, Altevogt P. Exosomes: from biogenesis and secretion to biological function. Immunol. Lett. 2006, 107:102–108.
 Li J, Yang X, et al. Exosome-derived microRNAs contribute to prostate cancer chemoresistance [J]. Int J Oncol. 2016, 49:838–46.
 Yamashita T, Takahashi Y, et al. Effect of exosome isolation methods on physicochemical properties of exosomes and clearance of exosomes from the blood circulation [J]. Eur. J. Pharm. 2016, 98:1–8.
 Miranda KC, Bond DT, et al. Massively parallel sequencing of human urinary exosome/microvesicle RNA reveals a predominance of non-coding RNA [J]. PloS ONE. 2014, 9:e96094.
 Zeringer E, Barta T, et al. Strategies for isolation of exosomes [J]. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc; 2015, pp. 319–323.
 Liga A, Vliegenthart AD, et al. Exosome isolation: a microfluidic road-map [J]. Lab Chip. 2015, 15:2388–2394.
 Kim D, Nishida H, et al. Chromatographically isolated CD63+CD81+ extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stromal cells rescue cognitive impairments after TBI [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016, 113:170–175.
 Batrakova EV, Kim MS. Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery [J]. J. Control Release. 2015;219:396–405.
Zarovni N, Corrado A, et al. Integrated isolation and quantitative analysis of exosome shuttled proteins and nucleic acids using immunocapture approaches [J]. Methods. 2015, 87:46–58.
 Kalra H, Adda CG, et al. Comparative proteomics evaluation of plasma exosome isolation techniques and assessment of the stability of exosomes in normal human blood plasma [J]. Proteomics. 2013, 13:3354–3364.
Gyorgy B, Modos K, et al. Detection and isolation of cell-derived microparticles are compromised by protein complexes resulting from shared biophysical parameters [J]. Blood. 2011, 117:e39–48.
 Quintana JF, Makepeace BL, et al. Extracellular Onchocerca-derived small RNAs in host nodules and blood [J]. Parasit. Vectors. 2015, 8:1.
 Lobb RJ, Becker M, et al. Optimized exosome isolation protocol for cell culture supernatant and human plasma [J]. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2015, 4:27031.
 Valcz G, Galamb O, et al. Exosomes in colorectal carcinoma formation: ALIX under the magnifying glass [J]. Mod Pathol. 2016, 29:928-38.
Join the 25,000 subscribers to get research hotpots, technical tips, latest information on events, sales and offers.
Sign up now!
We don't deal in spam.