Mucosal Immunity

The mucosa serves as the "first interface" between the external environment and the body. Many infections, inflammations, side effects of tumor treatments, and phenotypes related to the "microbiota-immune" axis occur at the mucosal surface. Once the barrier is compromised, microorganisms/antigens can more easily cross the epithelial layer, triggering local inflammation or even systemic immune responses. Effective defense by mucosal immunity often relies on Th17/IL-22 Axis-Mediated Barrier Support and Antimicrobial Peptide Induction, as well as Secretory IgA (sIgA) Immune Exclusion.

This topic breaks down mucosal immunity into four key questions: Is the barrier impaired/permeability increased? Is innate mucosal inflammation triggered? Is the Th17/IL-22 barrier defense axis activated? Is mucosal-specific antibody defense (sIgA) established? Each question provides Standard Panel (2 markers) vs. Expanded Panel (3-5 markers) Combination, facilitating rapid stratification, reducing trial and error, and supporting cross-species comparisons (Human/Mouse/Rat, etc.).

Typical Research Scene

Intestinal Inflammation/Microbiota Research

Does the barrier "leak," and does it trigger mucosal inflammation via the Th17 axis?

Respiratory Tract Infection/Vaccine

Whether mucosal defense is established and whether sIgA-related protection is present.

Mucosa-associated autoimmune/systemic inflammatory clues

Could changes in barriers be potential upstream triggers? (Interpret with caution)

Pharmacodynamics/Safety

Does the treatment damage the mucosal barrier, and does it cause abnormal mucosal inflammation or poor repair?

Are you currently researching the following issues?

CUSABIO Recommended Testing Project Combination (ContainSample Type and Time Point Recommendations)

Research Question Standard Panel (2 markers) Expanded Panel (3–5 markers) Quick Interpretation
Is the barrier damaged/has permeability increased? LBP + sCD14 LBP + sCD14 + IL-6 (± TNF-α/Zonulin) Check for signals of "microbial component trans-barrier exposure" and the inflammatory background.
Is congenital mucosal inflammation triggered? TNF-α + IL-1β TNF-α + IL-1β + IL-6 (± CXCL8/IL-8) Check if local pro-inflammatory responses are activated (and assess the intensity).
Is the Th17/IL-22 barrier defense axis activated? IL-17A + IL-22 IL-17A + IL-22 + IL-23 (± IL-1β/CXCL10) Check if the "Barrier Support + Antibacterial Defense" axis is activated.
Has mucosal antibody defense (sIgA) been established? sIgA + pIgR (or Secretory Component) sIgA + pIgR/SC + IL-17A (± IL-22/TGF-β1) Check whether mucosal antibodies are formed/transported more effectively and explain in conjunction with the barrier defense axis.

Sample Type Recommendation:

  • Serum/Plasma Suitable for trend stratification of "barrier impairment/systemic response" (e. g., LBP, sCD14, (if available) Zonulin, etc.)
  • Mucosal lavage fluid/saliva/nasal or BALF Suitable for assessing local sIgA, chemokines, and the local inflammatory context.
  • Tissue Homogenate/Lysate (Intestine/Lung, etc.) Closer to the local barrier and inflammatory microenvironment, but normalization and matrix interference control must be ensured.

Time Point Suggestions (Experience Window):

  • Barrier Damage/Permeability Changes: Commonly observed after stimulation. Hourly to 1–3 days (According to the model)
  • Congenital mucosal inflammation: usually earlier (2–24h)
  • Th17/IL-22 axis: often present 1–7 days More pronounced (according to the infection/immunity model)
  • sIgA: More inclined towards the "establishment phase," often Day-week scaleand is associated with pIgR-mediated transepithelial transport.

Experimental Objectives + Recommended Combinations Detailed

Question 1: Is the barrier damaged/has permeability increased?

When the mucosal barrier is compromised, luminal microorganisms or their components can more easily cross the epithelium, triggering immune system exposure and amplifying inflammation. LBP and sCD14 are commonly used to indicate a "systemic or local reaction context associated with exposure to microbial components." If accompanied by an increase in IL-6/TNF-α, this further supports the interpretation of "barrier alteration linked to inflammation." The structure and regulation of tight junctions serve as an important mechanistic background in barrier research.

Standard Panel (2 markers): LBP + sCD14

Expanded Panel (3-5 markers): LBP + sCD14 + IL-6 (± TNF-α/Zonulin)

Key Points of Interpretation:

  • LBP↑ + sCD14↑ (concomitant increase) Background enhancement for "Microbial-associated component exposure/trans-barrier risk" (more supportive of the possibility of barrier impairment or increased permeability).
  • LBP↑ but sCD14 is not significant Possibly in the early/mild exposure stage, or with significant individual variation; it is recommended to consider the time point and inflammatory context (IL-6/TNF-α).
  • LBP/sCD14 elevation + concurrent increase in IL-6/TNF-α More like a state of "barrier alteration and inflammation linkage" (more conducive to explaining phenotypes).
  • Zonulin↑ Can serve as an "auxiliary hint related to tight junction regulation," but Not recommended as direct evidence of barrier impairment. It is best interpreted in conjunction with LBP/sCD14 or local inflammatory markers.

Recommended Products:

Choose your experimental species:
Select the markers to detect:

Product Citation (Part):

Altered gut microbiota is associated with different immunologic responses to antiretroviral therapy in HIV‐infected men who have sex with men. Journal of medical virology, IF=(20.693)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Human Lipopolysaccharides,LPS ELISA Kit;CSB-E09945h

Human lipolysaccharide binding protein,LBP ELISA Kit;CSB-E09629h

Human soluble cluster of differentiation 14,sCD14 ELISA Kit;CSB-E13199h

Biomimetic Nanoparticle-Mediated Target Delivery of Hypoxia-Responsive Plasmid of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 to Reverse Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension. ACS nano, IF=(18.027)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Rat angiotensin II (ANG-Ⅱ) ELISA kit;CSB-E04494r

Rat angiotensin 1-7 (Ang1-7) ELISA kit;CSB-E14241r

Rat Angiotensin converting enzyme 2, ACE2 ELISA Kit;CSB-E14308r

Rat Interleukin 6,IL-6 ELISA KIT;CSB-E04640r

Rat TNF-α ELISA kit;CSB-E11987r

ACE2 shedding exacerbates sepsis-induced gut leak via loss of microbial metabolite 5-methoxytryptophan. Microbiome, IF=(12.7)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Human lipolysaccharide binding protein,LBP ELISA Kit;CSB-E09629h

Mouse Tumor necrosis factor α,TNF-α ELISA KIT;CSB-E04741m

Mouse Procalcitonin,PCT ELISA Kit;CSB-E10371m

References:

  • Neurath MF. The intestinal barrier: a pivotal role in health, inflammation, and disease. Cell Host & Microbe, 2025
  • Tajik N, et al. Targeting zonulin and intestinal epithelial barrier functionNature Communications, 2020

Question 2: Is congenital mucosal inflammation triggered?

Mucosal innate immunity typically rapidly releases pro-inflammatory factors during the early stages of stimulation/infection, driving local inflammatory responses, cell recruitment, and subsequent adaptive immune shaping. TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 are commonly used as readouts for "mucosal inflammation initiation and intensity." If the research focus leans toward epithelial/mucosal inflammatory recruitment, CXCL8/IL-8 can be added as needed to serve as a chemotactic output signal.

Standard Panel (2 markers): TNF-α + IL-1β

Expanded Panel (3-5 markers): TNF-α + IL-1β + IL-6 (± CXCL8/IL-8)

Key Points of Interpretation:

  • TNF-α↑ + IL-1β↑: Indicates that congenital mucosal inflammation has been initiated, commonly seen in the early stages of irritation/infection; suitable for answering "whether there is a trigger."
  • IL-6↑: More suitable for evaluation Inflammatory Intensity and Persistence(especially in group comparisons and efficacy evaluations).
  • CXCL8/IL-8↑: Indicates "enhanced chemotactic recruitment signals" (more closely associated with the context of local inflammatory cell recruitment), making it suitable for interpreting whether "inflammation will be amplified or if there is a trend toward cell recruitment."
  • TNF/IL-1β increased, but IL-6 was not significant. It may be very early or the stimulation intensity is limited; it is recommended to extend the time window to 6–24 hours (adjusted according to the model).
  • Only IL-6 is elevated, while TNF/IL-1β is not significantly increased. Exercise caution, as there may be a non-specific stress/tissue damage background or a later time point; it is recommended to cross-validate with Question 1 (barrier) or Topic 1/2.

Recommended Products:

Choose your experimental species:
Select the markers to detect:

Product Citation (Part):

Improvement of obesity-associated disorders by a small-molecule drug targeting mitochondria of adipose tissue macrophages. Nature communications, IF=(11.878)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Mouse Tumor necrosis factor α,TNF-α ELISA KIT;CSB-E04741m

Mouse Interleukin 6,IL-6 ELISA KIT;CSB-E04639m

Mouse Interleukin 1β,IL-1β ELISA Kit;CSB-E08054m

MyD88 deficiency ameliorates weight loss caused by intestinal oxidative injury in an autophagy‐dependent mechanism. The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, IF=(12.91)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Mouse Interleukin 1β,IL-1β ELISA Kit;CSB-E08054m

Mouse Tumor necrosis factor α,TNF-α ELISA KIT;CSB-E04741m

Mouse Interferon γ,IFN-γ ELISA Kit;CSB-E04578m

Mouse Interleukin 6,IL-6 ELISA KIT;CSB-E04639m

Lactobacillus reuteri improves the development and maturation of fecal microbiota in piglets through mother-to-infant microbe and metabolite vertical transmission. Microbiome, IF=(16.837)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Pig Interleukin 6,IL-6 ELISA Kit;CSB-E06786p

Pig Tumor necrosis factor (TNF/TNFA/TNFSF2) ELISA kit;CSB-E16980p

References:

  • Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell, 2010
  • Medzhitov R. Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature, 2007

Question 3: Is the Th17/IL-22 Barrier Defense Axis Activated?

In mucosal barrier defense, IL-17A and IL-22 are often regarded as key effector molecules: they can promote the production of antimicrobial peptides, enhance epithelial barrier function, and participate in defense processes such as neutrophil recruitment. Therefore, the combination of "IL-17A + IL-22" is well-suited for assessing whether the mucosal defense axis is activated. If you wish to focus more on upstream mechanisms, IL-23/IL-1β can be included as the context for Th17 maintenance and expansion.

Standard Panel (2 markers): IL-17A + IL-22

Expanded Panel (3-5 markers): IL-17A + IL-22 + IL-23 (± IL-1β/CXCL10)

Key Points of Interpretation:

  • IL-17A↑ + IL-22↑ The prompt "mucosal barrier defense axis" is activated (often associated with antimicrobial peptide induction and enhanced epithelial defense), suitable for answering "whether the defense has been raised."
  • IL-17A↑ but IL-22 is not significant It may be more inclined towards an inflammatory recruitment/neutrophil-related background, or at different stages of axis activation; it is recommended to examine upstream drivers in conjunction with IL-23/IL-1β.
  • IL-22↑ but IL-17A is not significant May reflect signals more inclined towards the "epithelial repair/barrier support" direction (depending on the model); it is recommended to interpret in conjunction with Question 1/5 (repair) or local injury readings.
  • IL-23↑ The Th17 axis "maintenance/amplification drive" is enhanced, making it more suitable for stratifying "why this group remains stronger."
  • IL-1β↑ + IL-17A/IL-22↑ The inflammatory drive and defense axis are indicated to operate in parallel, commonly observed in models of strong stimulation/infection; note that it may confer protection but also lead to inflammatory pathology, requiring comprehensive evaluation based on endpoint indicators (pathogen load/tissue damage).

Recommended Products:

Choose your experimental species:
Select the markers to detect:

Product Citation (Part):

Inhibition of free heme-catalyzed Fenton-like reaction prevents non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by hepatocyte-targeted hydrogen delivery. Biomaterials, IF=(15.304)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Mouse Tumor necrosis factor α,TNF-α ELISA KIT;CSB-E04741m

Mouse Interleukin 1β,IL-1β ELISA Kit;CSB-E08054m

Platelet–Monocyte Aggregate Instigates Inflammation and Vasculopathy in Kawasaki Disease. Advanced Science, IF=(14.3)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Human Tumor necrosis factor α,TNF-α ELISA KIT;CSB-E04740h

Human Interleukin 1β,IL-1β ELISA Kit;CSB-E08053h

Endosialin-positive CAFs promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression by suppressing CD8+ T cell infiltration. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, IF=(10.3)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Human monocyte interferon gamma inducing factor,MIG ELISA Kit;CSB-E09024h

Human interferon-inducible protein 10,IP-10 ELISA Kit;CSB-E08181h

Mouse C-X-C motif chemokine 9(CXCL9) ELISA kit;CSB-EL006252MO

Mouse interferon-inducible protein 10,IP-10 ELISA Kit;CSB-E08183m

References:

  • Mills KHG. IL-17 and IL-17-producing cells in protection versus pathology. Nat Rev Immunol, 2023
  • Kolls JK, McCray PB Jr, Chan YR. The role of Th17 cytokines in primary mucosal immunity. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 2010
  • Khader SA, Gaffen SL, Kolls JK. Th17 cells at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity… at the mucosa. Mucosal Immunology, 2009

Question 4: Has mucosal antibody defense (sIgA) been established?

Secretory IgA (sIgA) is one of the most critical antibody defenses on mucosal surfaces. It reduces pathogen and antigen contact with the epithelium through "immune exclusion" and participates in maintaining homeostasis with commensal bacteria. The formation of sIgA is closely related to the expression of pIgR (polymeric Ig receptor) by mucosal epithelial cells: pIgR mediates the trans-epithelial transport of dimeric IgA and generates the secretory component associated with sIgA. Therefore, the combination of sIgA and pIgR (or the secretory component) can be used to assess whether mucosal antibodies are formed or if their transport is enhanced.

Standard Panel (2 markers): sIgA + pIgR (or Secretory Component)

Expanded Panel (3-5 markers): sIgA + pIgR/SC + IL-17A (± IL-22/TGF-β1)

Key Points of Interpretation:

  • sIgA↑ + pIgR (or Secretory Component)↑: More supportive of the simultaneous enhancement of "mucosal antibody secretion + transepithelial transport," suggesting that mucosal antibody defense is tending to be established.
  • sIgA↑ but pIgR/SC not significant: It may be due to increased local secretion without significant changes in transport mechanisms, or differences in sampling sites/substrates; it is recommended to verify the sample type (lavage fluid/saliva/BALF vs. serum) and time points.
  • pIgR/SC↑ but sIgA is not significant: It may indicate that epithelial transport capacity/pathways are activated, but antibody production has not yet been established or the time point is relatively early; it is recommended to extend the time window (on the scale of days to weeks).
  • Enhanced version with IL-17A (± IL-22): When you observe an increase in the Th17/IL-22 axis alongside a rise in sIgA, it typically supports the interpretation of a trend toward "enhanced barrier defense and mucosal antibody synergy."
  • Enhanced version plus TGF-β1: Can serve as a background hint for IgA class switching, butTGF-β1 is also involved in the repair/fibrosis axis.When interpreting, it is recommended to integrate Topic 5 (Restoration) to avoid over-attribution.
  • Important Reminder: sIgA elevation is one of the strong signals of "defense establishment," but whether it constitutes "protective immunity" still requires consideration of antigen specificity and functional endpoints (such as infection load/symptom score/histology).

Recommended Products:

Choose your experimental species:
Select the markers to detect:

Product Citation (Part):

Pregnancy exposure of titanium dioxide nanoparticles causes intestinal dysbiosis and neurobehavioral impairments that are not significant postnatally but emerge in adulthood of offspring. Journal of nanobiotechnology, IF=(10.435)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Mouse secretory immunoglobulin A,sIgA ELISA Kit;CSB-E08413m

Mouse diamine oxidase,DAO ELISA Kit;CSB-E10090m

Tensile Stress‐Activated and Exosome‐Transferred YAP/TAZ‐Notch Circuit Specifies Type H Endothelial Cell for Segmental Bone Regeneration. Advanced science, IF=(14.3)

CUSABIO ELISA kits used in this study:

Human acidic fibroblast growth factor,aFGF/FGF-1 ELISA Kit;CSB-E04546h

Human Transforming Growth factor β1,TGF-β1 ELISA kit;CSB-E04725h

References:

  • Mantis NJ, Rol N, Corthésy B. Secretory IgA's complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis. Mucosal Immunology, 2011
  • Johansen FE, Kaetzel CS. Regulation of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor and IgA transport. Mucosal Immunology, 2011
  • Wei H, et al. Role of pIgR in IgA/IgM and mucosal immunity. 2021

Why Choose CUSABIO ELISA Kit?

More comprehensive coverage, convenient for panel creation

Common species (Human/Mouse/Rat) are comprehensively covered, and support forPig/Bovine/Dog/Rabbit, etc.Multi-species, suitable for cross-model and cross-species comparative studies.

Quality control is more clearly defined

Validation was conducted around key indicators such as detection range, sensitivity, specificity, linearity, recovery rate, and intra-/inter-batch precision, resulting in more stable and reproducible outcomes. (Click to view the 8 major quality control standards of CUSABIO ELISA kits.)

Sample compatibility is broader

Supports common sample types such as serum/plasma, cell supernatant, tissue homogenate/lysate, and adapts to different reading requirements from "initiation" to "systemic acute phase."

Ready-to-use for greater convenience

Complete facilities and standardized processes reduce preparation work and human error.

Global Customer Recognition

Currently, CUSABIO products have reached customers worldwide, with product citations in literature.Over 30, 000 articles, some published in Nature,Cell、Cell research、 High-impact journals such as Immunity. (Click to view CUSABIO 30000+ product citation literature)

Related Topic Recommendations

FAQ

Q: Why can't mucosal immunity research rely solely on measuring TNF-α/IL-6? +
A: Because the key to mucosal immunity lies not only in the "intensity of inflammation" but also in Barrier Integrity Whether the specific defense (Th17/IL-22 and sIgA) is established. Measuring only pro-inflammatory factors can easily miss the core mechanistic clues of "barrier leakage" or "insufficient defense."
Q: How to quickly determine if the "barrier may be compromised/permeability is increased"? +
A: Can be used first LBP + sCD14 Conduct initial screening as a prompt for "microbial component exposure-related background"; if combined with IL-6/TNF-α, it helps determine whether it is linked to inflammation. Tight junction regulation and barrier impairment are important mechanistic backgrounds.
Q: Can Zonulin serve as direct evidence of "leaky gut"? +
A: It is not advisable to treat Zonulin as a single, definitive "proof of leaky gut." It is more suitable as an "auxiliary reading related to barrier regulation" and should be interpreted comprehensively in conjunction with other barrier/inflammatory signals and model evidence.
Q: Why is the Th17/IL-22 axis so important in the mucosa? +
A: IL-17A and IL-22 are closely related to mucosal defense: they can promote the production of antimicrobial peptides, support barrier function, and participate in immune defense, but they may also drive inflammatory pathology under specific conditions. Therefore, "whether to activate and to what extent" is crucial.
Q: Why is it recommended to add IL-23 to the enhanced version of the Th17 axis? +
A: IL-23 is one of the critical upstream factors for the maintenance and expansion of Th17 responses. The addition of IL-23 helps link "effector outputs (IL-17/IL-22)" with "upstream maintenance signals," thereby enhancing the mechanistic interpretability of intergroup comparisons.
Q: Does seeing an increase in sIgA mean that "protective immunity has been established"? +
A: sIgA elevation is an important signal, but whether it provides "protection" depends on antigen specificity, the time window, and functional outcomes. The classic roles of sIgA include immune exclusion and homeostasis maintenance, and it is recommended to interpret it alongside infection load, histology, or functional endpoints.
Q: How to choose sample type: serum vs lavage fluid/saliva/BALF? +
A:
  • Serum/Plasma More suitable for systematic trend and cohort comparisons (barrier exposure background, systemic inflammation).
  • Irrigation fluid/secretions Closer to the mucosal local (sIgA, local chemotaxis/inflammatory signals)
  • Tissue homogenate More suitable for observing local barriers and inflammatory microenvironment (pay attention to normalization and matrix interference).
Note: This page only provides indicator selection and result interpretation guidance; specific experimental conditions should be validated according to your model and substrate.
icon of phone
Call us
301-363-4651 (Available 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. CST from Monday to Friday)
icon of address
Address
7505 Fannin St., Ste 610, Room 7 (CUBIO Innovation Center), Houston, TX 77054, USA
icon of social media
Join us with

Subscribe newsletter

Leave a message

* To protect against spam, please pass the CAPTCHA test below.
CAPTCHA verification
© 2007-2026 CUSABIO TECHNOLOGY LLC All rights reserved. 鄂ICP备15011166号-1